Understanding the Genetic Influences on Sexual Orientation
Written on
Chapter 1: Historical Perspectives on Sexual Orientation
For much of the 20th century, the discourse surrounding sexual orientation was driven by misguided scientific theories presented as facts. The prevailing belief was that unknown developmental issues led to non-heterosexual orientations, resulting in horrific treatments for LGBTQI+ individuals, including the use of electric shock therapy. This form of "treatment" did nothing to address actual attractions but rather coerced individuals into falsely claiming improvements to avoid further abuse.
In contrast to this troubling history, our current understanding of sexual orientation has evolved significantly. Central to this advancement are twin studies, which serve as invaluable tools for discerning the genetic components of traits. By examining the concordance rates between twins, researchers can determine the likelihood that twins will share specific characteristics. Identical twins, sharing nearly 100% of their genetic makeup, are expected to show higher concordance for genetic traits compared to non-identical twins, who share about 50%. Research has indicated that genetics accounts for roughly 30% of the variance in same-sex attraction (Alanko et al., 2010; Hershberger, 2001; Kendler et al., 2000; Långström et al., 2010; Zietsch et al., 2012).
Section 1.1: Advances in Genetic Research
As we move into the present day, more sophisticated genetic studies, such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have reinforced the understanding of genetic influences on sexual orientation. These studies analyze millions of genetic variants across the genome to pinpoint those linked to specific traits. The most extensive research on the genetics of same-sex behavior, which included over 477,000 participants, revealed that multiple genes contribute to this orientation rather than a single "gay gene" (Ganna et al., 2019). The findings indicated a heritability range of 8–25%, depending on the analytical techniques employed, supporting earlier twin studies while also suggesting that genetics does not provide a complete explanation.
The first video, "Is sexual orientation genetic—or just a choice?" explores the ongoing debate about whether genetics or personal choice plays a larger role in determining sexual orientation.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Complexity of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors
While we acknowledge that genetic factors contribute to variations in same-sex attraction, the influence of non-genetic factors remains largely unexplained. The transition from speculation to twin studies and, eventually, GWAS underscores the progress made in this field, yet it also illuminates the intricate nature of human sexual orientation. As researchers continue to investigate, understanding the relationship between genetic and non-genetic influences remains a significant challenge.
The second video, "New study finds there is no single gene that determines sexual orientation," discusses findings from recent research that debunked the notion of a singular genetic determinant of sexual orientation.
Section 1.2: The Path Forward
The exploration of sexual orientation's genetic underpinnings is ongoing, with researchers striving to unravel the complex interplay of biological and environmental factors. This journey highlights the multifaceted nature of human sexuality and the need for continued research in this domain.
References
- Alanko, K., Santtila, P., Harlaar, N., Witting, K., Varjonen, M., Jern, P., … & Sandnabba, N. K. (2010). Common genetic effects of gender atypical behavior in childhood and sexual orientation in adulthood: A study of Finnish twins. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 81–92.
- Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., … & Zietsch, B. P. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365(6456), eaat7693.
- Hershberger, S. L. (2001). Biological factors in the development of sexual orientation. Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities and Youth: Psychological Perspectives, 27–51.
- Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., Gilman, S. E., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Sexual orientation in a US national sample of twin and nontwin sibling pairs. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(11), 1843–1846.
- Långström, N., Rahman, Q., Carlström, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2010). Genetic and environmental effects on same-sex sexual behavior: A population study of twins in Sweden. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 75–80.
- Zietsch, B. P., Verweij, K. J., Heath, A. C., Madden, P. A., Martin, N. G., Nelson, E. C., & Lynskey, M. T. (2012). Do shared etiological factors contribute to the relationship between sexual orientation and depression?. Psychological Medicine, 42(3), 521–532.